Skip to main content

How to write an RFP for digital risk management

Requirements, questions, and evaluation criteria specific to digital risk management procurement

7 min read

Digital risk management (DRM) software is critical for navigating today's complex threat landscape, but procurement requires careful consideration. Given the rapidly evolving nature of cyber threats and the increasing complexity of digital environments, a well-structured RFP is essential for identifying a solution that aligns with your organization's specific needs and risk profile.

What makes digital risk management RFPs different

DRM RFPs differ significantly from standard software RFPs due to the intricate nature of cybersecurity and risk mitigation. The evaluation process must account for both technical capabilities and the vendor's understanding of emerging threats, regulatory compliance, and the organization's risk appetite. DRM solutions often involve complex integrations with existing security infrastructure, making interoperability a key consideration.

Furthermore, the continuous evolution of the threat landscape necessitates a focus on the vendor's commitment to ongoing research, development, and threat intelligence updates.nnUnlike other software categories, a failed DRM implementation can have catastrophic consequences, including data breaches, regulatory fines, and reputational damage.

Therefore, the RFP must thoroughly assess the vendor's ability to provide comprehensive protection, proactive threat detection, and effective incident response capabilities. A strong focus on data accuracy, low false positive rates, and actionable insights is crucial for ensuring the solution delivers tangible value and reduces the organization's overall risk exposure.nnFinally, DRM solutions must seamlessly bridge the gap between technical data and business governance.

The RFP should evaluate the vendor's ability to quantify cyber risks in financial terms, enabling informed decision-making and effective communication with executive stakeholders.

  • Integration capabilities with existing security and IT infrastructure
  • Ability to quantify cyber risk in financial terms
  • Vendor's commitment to ongoing threat intelligence and research
  • Compliance with relevant industry regulations and standards

RFP vs RFI vs RFQ

Here's when to use each document type when procuring digital risk management software.

RFI

Request for Information

Use early in your search to understand what vendors offer and narrow your list. Gather general capabilities, company background, and high-level pricing ranges.

RFP

Request for Proposal

Use when you know your requirements and want detailed vendor solutions and pricing. This is your main evaluation document for shortlisted vendors.

RFQ

Request for Quote

Use when requirements are fixed and you just need final pricing. Often used after RFP when you're ready to negotiate with finalists.

When procuring digital risk management software, an RFI is useful for initial market research and understanding available solutions. An RFP is essential for detailed evaluation of vendor capabilities, technical specifications, and pricing, while an RFQ is generally unsuitable due to the complexity and customization involved.

Technical requirements checklist

Use this checklist when defining your RFP scope.

Attack Surface Management

  • Automated discovery of internet-facing assets
  • Identification of shadow IT and unmanaged cloud resources
  • Continuous monitoring for vulnerabilities and misconfigurations
  • External attack surface mapping and risk scoring

Third-Party Risk Management

  • Vendor security risk assessments and ratings
  • Fourth-party risk identification and mapping
  • Continuous monitoring of vendor security posture
  • Automated vendor risk remediation workflows

Threat Intelligence

  • Integration with threat intelligence feeds
  • Real-time threat detection and analysis
  • Automated threat response and remediation
  • Dark web monitoring for leaked credentials and data

Cyber Risk Quantification

  • Financial modeling of cyber risk exposure
  • Translation of technical vulnerabilities into financial impact
  • Risk-based prioritization of remediation efforts
  • Reporting on potential financial losses from cyber incidents

Integration Requirements

  • SIEM/SOAR integration
  • Cloud provider integration (AWS, Azure, GCP)
  • ITSM integration (ServiceNow, Jira)
  • Identity and access management (IAM) integration

Questions to include in your RFP

Architecture & Deployment

  • Describe your platform's architecture, including its scalability, redundancy, and security features.
    Understanding the underlying architecture ensures the platform can handle your organization's needs.
  • What deployment options are available (cloud, on-premise, hybrid), and what are the pros and cons of each?
    Deployment options need to align with your organization's infrastructure and security policies.
  • Detail your data residency and data sovereignty policies.
    Ensures compliance with data privacy regulations.
  • Describe your approach to disaster recovery and business continuity.
    Ensures minimal disruption in the event of a system failure or cyberattack.

Attack Surface Management

  • How does your platform automatically discover and inventory all internet-facing assets, including shadow IT?
    Comprehensive visibility is critical for identifying and mitigating risks.
  • What vulnerability scanning capabilities are included, and how frequently are scans performed?
    Regular scanning helps identify and prioritize vulnerabilities.
  • Describe your approach to identifying and mitigating misconfigurations.
    Misconfigurations are a common entry point for attackers.
  • How does your platform prioritize vulnerabilities based on risk and business impact?
    Prioritization ensures that the most critical vulnerabilities are addressed first.

Third-Party Risk Management

  • How does your platform assess the security risk of third-party vendors?
    Third-party vendors can introduce significant risk to your organization.
  • Describe your approach to identifying and mapping fourth-party dependencies.
    Understanding the entire supply chain is critical for managing risk.
  • How does your platform continuously monitor the security posture of third-party vendors?
    Continuous monitoring ensures that vendors maintain a strong security posture.
  • What automated workflows are available for vendor risk remediation?
    Automated workflows streamline the remediation process.

Threat Intelligence

  • What threat intelligence feeds are integrated into your platform?
    Access to relevant threat intelligence is critical for proactive threat detection.
  • How does your platform correlate threat intelligence data with internal security events?
    Correlation helps identify and prioritize real threats.
  • Describe your platform's capabilities for detecting and responding to phishing attacks.
    Phishing attacks are a common entry point for attackers.
  • How does your platform monitor the dark web for leaked credentials and data?
    Dark web monitoring helps detect and prevent data breaches.

Cyber Risk Quantification

  • How does your platform quantify cyber risk in financial terms?
    Financial quantification enables informed decision-making and effective communication with executive stakeholders.
  • What financial models are used to calculate risk exposure (e.g., Open FAIR)?
    Understanding the underlying financial models ensures transparency and accuracy.
  • Can we customize the financial model to reflect our organization's specific risk appetite?
    Customization ensures that the model aligns with your organization's unique circumstances.
  • How does your platform help prioritize remediation efforts based on financial impact?
    Prioritization ensures that the most impactful risks are addressed first.

Reporting & Analytics

  • What reporting capabilities are included, and can we customize reports to meet our specific needs?
    Customizable reports provide the insights you need to track progress and demonstrate value.
  • Do you provide executive dashboards that summarize key risk metrics and trends?
    Executive dashboards provide a high-level overview of your organization's risk posture.
  • How does your platform track and measure the effectiveness of remediation efforts?
    Tracking effectiveness helps demonstrate the value of your DRM program.
  • Can you provide examples of reports that demonstrate risk reduction and ROI?
    Examples provide insight into the platform's reporting capabilities.

Compliance and security requirements

Depending on your industry, you may need to require proof of these certifications and standards.

SOC 2 Type II

Required for demonstrating security and availability of cloud services. If applicable, request a copy of their SOC 2 Type II report and inquire about any exceptions or qualifications.

ISO 27001

Required for establishing an information security management system. If applicable, request a copy of their ISO 27001 certification and inquire about the scope of the certification.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework

Required for organizations aligning with us federal cybersecurity standards. If applicable, inquire about their alignment with the NIST Cybersecurity Framework and request documentation.

GDPR

Required if processing personal data of eu citizens. If applicable, inquire about their GDPR compliance measures and request documentation.

HIPAA

Required if handling protected health information (phi). If applicable, request a BAA (Business Associate Agreement) and inquire about their HIPAA compliance measures.

Evaluation criteria

Here is the suggested weighting for digital risk management RFPs.

Functionality Fit How well the solution meets the stated requirements and addresses the organization's specific risk profile.
25%
Integration Capabilities The ease and depth of integration with existing security and IT infrastructure.
20%
Cyber Risk Quantification The accuracy and sophistication of the platform's cyber risk quantification capabilities.
15%
Threat Intelligence The quality and relevance of the threat intelligence feeds integrated into the platform.
15%
Vendor Stability & Market Maturity The vendor's financial health, customer retention rates, and R&D investment.
10%
Total Cost of Ownership Implementation, licensing, and ongoing costs.
10%
Usability & Support The ease of use of the platform and the quality of the vendor's support services.
5%

Some weights were adjusted based on your priorities.

  • Increase if complex integration requirements exist.
  • Increase if financial risk analysis is a critical requirement.

Red flags to watch

  • Vague pricing responses

    Vendors who can't provide clear pricing often have hidden costs or complex fee structures that inflate TCO.

  • No customer references in your industry

    Lack of relevant references suggests limited experience with your specific requirements and use cases.

  • Reliance on manual data collection

    Solutions that rely on manual data collection are less accurate and scalable than automated solutions.

  • Limited integration capabilities

    Solutions that don't integrate well with existing security and IT infrastructure can create data silos and increase complexity.

  • High false positive rates

    Solutions with high false positive rates can create alert fatigue and overwhelm security teams.

Key metrics to request

Ask vendors to provide benchmarks from similar customers.

Mean Time To Detect (MTTD)

Indicates how quickly the platform can identify and alert on potential threats.

Mean Time To Respond (MTTR)

Indicates how quickly the platform can help remediate identified threats.

False Positive Rate

Indicates the accuracy of the platform's threat detection capabilities.

Customer Satisfaction Score (CSAT)

Indicates the overall satisfaction of existing customers with the vendor's product and services.

Implementation Timeline for Similar Customers

Helps set realistic expectations and identify potential delays.

Percentage of Attack Surface Covered

Indicates the comprehensiveness of the platform's attack surface management capabilities.